VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Sh. Kala Chand Chakma and 4 Ors v. The Chief Executive Member, Chakma Autonomous District Council and 5 Ors

Dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to approach again
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
29 September 2024
Bench
Nelson Sailoauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 79/2024

Judgment

ORDER B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

30.09.2024 Mr. A K Rokhum, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have challenged the Notification dated 19.06.2024 by which the Executive Body of Ajasora-III Village Council has been placed under suspension for a period of 3 (three) months with immediate effect. He submits that since the period of 3 (three) months have expired the writ petition has become infructuous. He, however, submits that liberty may be granted to file a fresh writ petition if cause of action survives. In view of above, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to file afresh, if cause of action survives.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030004832024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/79/2024 Sh. Kala Chand Chakma and 4 Ors. S/o Maratya Chakma (L), R/o Ajasora-III, Lawngtlai District, Mizoram 2: Smt. Chaya Rani Chakma 3: Sh. Bangala Chakma 4: Sh. Lokhi Dhan Chakma 5: Sh. Proti Lal Chakm VERSUS The Chief Executive Member, Chakma Autonomous District Council and 5 Ors. Through the Executive Secretary, Kamalanagar, District Lawngtlai, Mizoram 2:The Executive Member i/c Local Administration Dept. Chakma Autonomous District Council 3:The Local Administrative Officer Chakma Autonomous District Council 4:Sh. Bhaba Chandra Chakma 5:Sh. Maya Ranjan Chakma 6:Sh. Borchoka Chakm Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Ashok Kumar Rokhum Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent :

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.