- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 14 March 2024
- Bench
- Soumitra Saikia
- Case no.
- WP(C) 123/2022
Judgment
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030004952022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/123/2022 Lalnunmawia and 17 Ors. S/o M. Lalchuha R/o Bungkawn H/S Veng, Aizawl. 2: Francis Lalhlimpuia S/o J. Rohnuna
R/o Zonuam Aizawl. 3: Goretti Lalthatluangi D/o Robert Lalchhuana R/o Electric Veng Aizawl. 4: Vanlallawmzuala S/o Hmingthanzauva R/o Serchhip. 5: Remruatfeli Ralte D/o R. lalnghaka (L) R/o Mission Vengthlang Aizawl. 6: Jeremy Zosangliana S/o Samuel Lalchhuansanga R/o Nursery Veng Aizawl. 7: Kevin K.C. Liana S/o G. Naulak R/o MINECO Aizawl. 8: Lalnunsanga S/o Rodailova Page No.# 2/4 R/o bawngkawn Aizawl. 9: P.C. Lalrosiama S/o P.C. Lalchhanhima R/o Zemabawk Aizawl. 10: Zothansangi D/o R. Lalrinsanga R/o Mamit Hmar Veng. 11: Zodingliani Sailo D/o Lalmuankimi R/o Durtlang Leitan Aizawl. 12: Lalneihpuii Colney D/o Biakinmawia Colney R/o Ramthar Aizawl. 13: Vanlalfela S/o Vanlalmuani R/o Bungkawn Aizawl. 14: Lalmawizuala S/o Lalfamkimi R/o Zemabawk Aizawl. 15: Lalhruaizela S/o Lalhmuakliana R/o Armed Veng Aizawl. 16: Britto Lamzading S/o Stephen Dalzathanga R/o Champhai Vengthar. 17: Rammuanpuia S/o PC Lalsangzuala R/o Salem Veng Aizawl. 18: Lalduhkimi D/o Lalhmuakliana Page No.# 3/4 R/o Armed Veng Aizawl VERSUS The Director (GDS Section), Ministry of Communication, Govt. of India and 5 Ors. Department of Posts, Dak Bhawan, New Delhi - 110001 2:The Secy. Deptt. of Posts and Chairperson Postal Services Board Dak Bhawan New Delhi - 110001 3:The Post Master General North-East-II Region Shillong Meghalaya - 793001 4:The Senior Superintendent of Posts Meghalaya Division Meghalaya - 793001 5:The Postmaster General Deptt. of Posts Office of the Director Postal Services Aizawl - 796001 Mizoram Division. 6:The Superintendent of Posts Deptt. of Posts Office of the Director Postal Services Aizawl - 796001 Mizoram Division Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Medhi for R6
:: BEFORE:: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ::ORDER::
15.03.2024 Heard Ms. Rosalynn L Hmar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Page No.# 4/4 Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC for the respondent No. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal urging the grievances before the Tribunal in the first instance and therefore, seeks liberty to approach and file it before the Tribunal. Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned CGC does not have any objections to the prayer. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal in respect of the same subject matter. Interim order if any stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.