Hari Dash Chakma and 4 Ors v. The Chief Executive Member Through the Executive Secretary, Chakma Autonomous Council and 6 Ors

ORDER BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

13.09.2024

Heard Ms. Simran Thapa, learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the Order dated 13.09.2024 passed in I.A.(C) No. 159/2024, the Chakma Autonomous District Council, represented by the Executive Secretary of the Chakma Autonomous District Council, Kamalanagar, Lawngtlai District, Mizoram and the Secretary to the Government of Mizoram, District Council & Minority Affairs Department, Aizawl, Mizoram have been impleaded as respondent Nos. 8 and 9. Issue notice to the respondent Nos. 8 & 9. Mrs. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Additional Advocate General accepts notice on behalf of the respondent No. 9. Petitioner shall take steps for service of notice upon the respondent No. 8 by registered post with A/D within a week. In terms of the Order dated 29.08.2024, the petitioner was to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 by dasti mode routed through the Registry of this Court. Thereafter, an affidavit was to be submitted by the petitioner. An affidavit dated 04.09.2024 has been submitted by the petitioner, which states that notice has been served through dasti mode upon the respondent Nos. 1 to 7. However, a perusal of the notice served through dasti mode shows that all the notices had been served upon one Mr. Amarendra Chakma, the Laison Officer (Administration) of the CADC, Aizawl. The notices have not been served upon the concerned Page No.# 4/4 respondents in question. Accordingly, the service of notice through dasti mode had not been complied with by the petitioner. In view of the above, the petitioner's counsel submits that they may be allowed to serve notice upon the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 through registered post with A/D within a week. The prayer of the petitioner's counsel is allowed. Petitioner to take steps for service of notice upon the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 by registered post with A/D within a week. List the matter after 4 (four) weeks.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC030005872024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/95/2024 Sh. Hari Dash Chakma and 4 Ors. S/o Sudar Sen Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 2: Sh. Sadhan Mitra Chakma S/o Dandi Raja Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 3: Sh. Maha Raj Chakma S/o Patosya Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 4: Sh. Rabati Ranjan Chakma S/o Prolhad Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 5: Smt. Demkuli Chakma D/o Biranga Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram. VERSUS Page No.# 2/4 The Chief Executive Member Chakma Autonomous District Council and 6 Ors. through the Executive Secretary Kamalanagar District Lawngtlai Mizoram 2:The Executive Member i/c Local Administration Dept. Chakma Autonomous District Council through the Local Administration Officer 3:Sh. Satanya Lal Chakma S/o Chigon Chand Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 4:Sh. Amullya Ratan Chakma S/o Kolish Kumar Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 5:Sh. Parimal Chakma S/o Noloni Kumar Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 6:Sh. Sunila Chakma S/o Grish Chandra Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram 7:Sh. Dulai Chakma S/o Loni Mohan Chakma R/o Borkolok Lawngtlai District Mizoram Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Ashok Kumar Rokhum Advocate for the Respondent : Page No.# 3/4