- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 21 April 2024
- Bench
- Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- WP(C) 15/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 22-04-2024 Mr. T. Taba, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to file afresh, since some vital documents have not been enclosed in the instant writ petition. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of, on withdrawal, with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040000462024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/15/2024 Takam Pariyo proprietor of M/s Reniya Enterprises, s/o Takam Mangha, resident of F Sector, Itanagar, AP VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Ors rpresented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:The Commissioner (Power) Age: 0 Occupation : AP Civil Secretariat Govt of AP Itanagar 3:The Chief Engineer (Power) Age: 0 Occupation : Department of Power Central Zone Govt of AP 4:The Executive Engineer (E) Age: 0 Occupation : Sagalee Electrical Division Sagalee Department of Power Govt of AP 5:The Superintending Engineer (E) Age: 0 Occupation : APEC-I Naharlagun Department of Power Govt of AP 6:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Tender Opening Committee cum SE (E) APEC-I Naharlagun Department of Power Page No.# 2/2 Govt of AP 7:State Nodal Officer Age: 0 Occupation : RDSS Department of Power Naharlagun Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.