- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 April 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- WP(C) 17/2024
Judgment
ORDER
04.04.2024
Mr. T. Taba, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to file a fresh. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with a liberty as prayed for. JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040000482024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/17/2024 Takam Pariyo proprietor of M/S Reniya Enterprises, S/o Takam Mangha, resident of F Sector, Papumpare District, Itanagar, AP VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:The Commissioner (Power) Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Chief Engineer (Powre) Age: 0 Occupation : 4:The Executive Enginer (Electrical) Age: 0 Occupation : 5:The Superintedning Engineer (Electricla) Age: 0 Occupation : 6:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/2 7:The State Nodal Officer Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.