Sangey Phuntsok v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 06.03.2024 Heard Mr. Tsering Gyatso, learned counsel for the accused/ applicant. Also heard Mr. Jambey Tsering, learned P.P., appearing on behalf of the respondent State of Arunachal Pradesh. Mr. K. Yangfo, Inspector, Naharlagun Police Station, and I.O. of the case, has appeared in person and submitted that CD was not being forwarded on account of some miscommunication arising in the matter. The explanation is accepted. In view of the above, the personal appearance of Mr. Yangfo, Inspector, Naharlagun Police Station, is hereby dispensed with.

Page No.# 2/2 Perused the CD with the assistance of the learned P.P., Arunachal Pradesh. It is seen that the investigation has fairly progressed and custodial interrogation of the accused applicant is not deemed necessary in the interest of investigation and accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted by this Court vide order, dated

19.01.2024, is hereby made absolute on the same terms and conditions. However, it is hereby directed that the accused applicant shall fully cooperate with the I.O. of the case and shall appear before the I.O. of the case as and when he may be so called. The anticipatory bail application accordingly stands disposed of. The CD be sent back, forthwith.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040000532024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/12/2024 Sangey Phuntsok S/o Pema Dondup, R/o Mukto Village, PO Mukto, PS Jang, Tawang Distirct, AP VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR