- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 6 February 2024
- Bench
- Malasri Nandi
- Case no.
- IA(C) 112/2018
Judgment
ORDER
07.02.2024
Heard Mr. K. M. Mahanta, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. L. Narah, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. It is submitted by Mr. Narah, learned counsel for the respondents that he is going to submit the Vakalatnama by today itself. On the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, this order is passed accordingly. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 313 days in filing the connected Regular First Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 12.05.2017 passed in Title Suit No. 05/2016, passed by the Civil Judge (Sr) Division, Yupia. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the matter has been settled between the parties. Apart from that the grounds of delay has been stated in paragraph No. 2 of the Appeal. On the other hand, Mr. L. Narah, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 submits that he has no objection if the delay is condoned in filing the connected Appeal. Page No.# 3/3 In view of the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the parties, this interlocutory application is allowed. Accordingly, the delay of 313 days in filing the connected appeal is condoned. Interlocutory application stands disposed of. As the Appeal has already been registered, list the matter for admission.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040001142018 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/112/2018 R.K MISSION HOSPITAL REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY RK MISSION HOSPITAL , PO R.K MISSION, PS ITANAGAR PAPUM PARE DIST. AP. VERSUS R.K MISSION EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. AND 7 ORS. GANGA, PO RK MISSION, PS ITANAGAR, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY Dr. Moon Moon Das, R/O RK MISSION COMPLEX, GANGA, PO RK MISSION DIST. AP. 2:SMTI RONJITA SINGH Age: 0 Occupation : 3:SMT. JOYA SINGHA Age: 0 Occupation : 4:SMT PERIK ETE Age: 0 Occupation : 5:SMT. KAMAL CHAUHAN Age: 0 Occupation : 6:MS SAJNI NAPU SOKI Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 7:SHRI AK PAUL Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.K K Mahanta, Sr. Advocate Advocate for the Respondent : Dicky Panging BEFORE Hon'ble MRs. JUSTICE malasri nandi
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.