Gautam Karbak v. The State of Ap and 2 Ors

ORDER Date : 04-04-2024 Heard Mr. Mr. Kato, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Picha, learned standing counsel for the Rural Development Department. Page No.# 2/2 It is submitted at the Bar that the grievances of the petitioner have been duly addressed, therefore, the matter become infructuous. In view of above, writ petition stand closed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040001332024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/54/2024 Gautam Karbak Son of Late Jumgam Karbak, permanent resident of Kamba, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 2 Ors represented by the Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : Rural Development Govt of AP Itanagar 3:The Block Development Age: 0 Occupation : Rumgong Community Development Rumgong Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Marto Kato Advocate for the Respondent : Binter Picha BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE