- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 9 May 2024
- Bench
- Susmita Phukan Khaund, Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- RFA 1/2021
Judgment
ORDER Date : 10.05.2024 (S.P. Khaund, J)
Heard Mr. D. Laji, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. T. Garam, learned counsel for the respondent. Both the parties have filed an application for settlement of their dispute which is registered as IA(C) No. 76(AP)/2024.
Since both the parties have agreed to abide by the terms and conditions of the Annexure-1 annexed with the interlocutory application which has been marked as 'X', this appeal is disposed of as per the observations of the IA(C) No. 76(AP)/2024. The agreement 'X' will also form a part of the decree dated
31.07.2020 in connection with Divorce Case No. 03/2019.
This appeal is disposed of under the same terms and conditions.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040006052024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. :RFA/1/2021 Achung Natung Age: 36 Occupation : Address:S/O DUGU NATUNG R/O VILLAGE PIPOKORO PO/PS SEPPA DIST. EAST KAMENG AP. VERSUS Rani Gyadi Age: 0 Occupation : Address:W/O SHRI ACHUNG NATUNG R/O VILLAGE NEREWA PO/PS SEPPA DIST. EAST KAMENG AP. ------------ Advocate for : Duyu Laji Advocate for : Gimi Tarak appearing for Rani Gyadi: Advocate appearing for respectively. Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.