Taba Rajan v. The State of Ap and 3 Ors

ORDER Date : 14-02-2024 Heard Mr. K. Lollen, the learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. Tapin, the learned Senior Government Advocate for respondents No. 1, 2, 3 and 4.

The applicant has filed an application under Order 41 Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying for adducing additional evidence before the appellate court.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that documents filed as Annexure-1 to 4, were developed during the pendency of the appeal being RFA No.09/2018. And as such, those documents are required to be proved in the appeal by adducing additional evidence before the appellate court.

The learned Senior Government Advocate for the respondents has made no objection on the prayer by the applicant.

Hence, on prayer of the applicant to accept the documents vide Annexure 1 to 4 for adducing additional evidence before the appellate court is allowed.

Page No.# 3/3 The interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040001842024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/26/2024 Taba Rajan Son of Shri Taba Taha, resident of Village Yazali, PO Yazali, Lower Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented by the Commissioner, PWD, Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:The Chief Engineer (CZ) Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : 4:The Executive Enginere Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Geli Taye Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI