- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 28 May 2024
- Bench
- Kalyan Rai Surana
- Case no.
- WP(C) 78/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 29.05.2024 None appears on call for the petitioner. However, Ms. P. Pangu, learned Govt. advocate appearing for respondent nos. 1 to 3 is present. The order sheet reveals that the petitioner had remained unrepresented when the matter was previously listed on 08.09.2023, 06.11.2023 and
01.04.2024. Hence, it appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002012023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/78/2023 Paching Tayum S/o Lt. Paching Tade, Gohput Tinali, Itanagar, PO/PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District (AP) VERSUS THE STATE OF AP and 5 Ors. to be represented by through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Extra Assistant Commissioner (Estate) Age: 0 Occupation : 4:Minu Dodum Age: 0 Occupation : 5:Ila Jyoti Mize Age: 0 Occupation : 6:Tai Talley Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : M Nibo Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.