Marge Pakam v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 27-02-2024 Heard Ms. Aruna Rai, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Apprehending his arrest in connection with Basar PS Case No. 03/2024 under Sections 352/354/447 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, this Anticipatory Bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the accused applicant, namely, Shri Marge Pakam. Page No.# 2/2 The Case Diary has been received and the same has been duly perused. The materials as available in the Case Diary reveals that the accused applicant had duly appeared before the Investigating Officer in terms of the directions of this Court vide order dated 19.02.2024. Further taking into consideration the statements of the witnesses as recorded by the Investigating Officer as well as the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties in the present proceedings, this Court is of the view that the custodial interrogation of the accused applicant is not warranted and accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted by this Court vide order dated 19.02.2024, is hereby made absolute on the same terms and conditions. The accused applicant is hereby directed to cooperate with the Investigating Officer of the case in the further investigation that may be necessitated. The anticipatory bail application accordingly stands disposed of. The Case Diary be sent back, forthwith.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002112024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/25/2024 Marge Pakam Son of Shri Tomar Pakam, resident of Kadi Village, Basar, P.O and P.S Basar, Lepa Rada District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR