- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 26 August 2024
- Bench
- Kakheto Sema, Mridul Kumar Kalita
- Case no.
- IA(Crl) 8/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 27.08.2024 (K. Sema, J) Heard Mr. Tabit Tapak, learned counsel for the applicant. The application has been filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1953 praying for condonation of delay of 129 days in filing the connected criminal appeal against the judgment & order dated 09/08/2023 and sentence order dated 09/08/2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Khonsa Division, Tripa district, Arunachal Pradesh in Khonsa/SC (POCSO) Case No. 05/2020 corresponding to Longding P.S Case No. 12/2019 under section 376/366 IPC r/w section 4 of the POCSO Act. The ground for the delay has been explained in paragraph-3, 4,5 & 6 of the application. We have perused the application and we are satisfied that the applicant has satisfactorily explained the delay. The delay of 129 days is accordingly condoned. The application stands disposed.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002162024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/8/2024 Chugat Gangsa @ Pansa Wife of Shri Pange Pansa, Nginu village, PO and PS Wakka, Longding District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and Anr represented through the PP of AP 2:Ilen T Bowam (Teacher) Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Tabit Tapak Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.