Pagjum Ori Bam v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 27-02-2024 Heard Ms. Aruna Rai, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Apprehending her arrest in connection with Basar PS Case No. 04/2024 under Sections 352/506/323/447/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Section 3 of PDPP Act, this Anticipatory Bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been preferred by the accused applicant, Page No.# 2/2 namely, Smti Pagjum Ori Bam. The Case Diary has been received and the same has been duly perused. The materials as available in the Case Diary reveals that the accused applicant had duly appeared before the Investigating Officer in terms of the directions of this Court vide order dated 19.02.2024. Further taking into consideration the statements of the witnesses as recorded by the Investigating Officer as well as the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties in the present proceedings, this Court is of the view that the custodial interrogation of the accused applicant is not warranted and accordingly, the interim pre-arrest bail granted by this Court vide order dated 19.02.2024, is hereby made absolute on the same terms and conditions. The accused applicant is hereby directed to cooperate with the Investigating Officer of the case in the further investigation that may be necessitated. The anticipatory bail application accordingly stands disposed of. The Case Diary be sent back, forthwith. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002222024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/31/2024 Pagjum Ori Bam Wife of Shri Markar Bam, permanent resident of Basar, P.O and P.S Basar, Leparada District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP Advocate for the Petitioner : Reken Ingo Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR