VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Khyoda Heri and 12 Ors v. The State of Ap and 4 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
22 February 2023
Bench
Nani Tagiaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 101/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 22.02.2023 Heard Mr. T. Torum, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate representing the State respondents No. 1 to 4. The case of the petitioners in this writ petition is that the petitioners had donated land to the Government of Arunachal Pradesh for setting up of Param Putu Administrative Circle. The Chief Secretary to the Government of Arunachal Pradesh vide notification dated 22.10.2019 vide Order No. DAD-62/96/2091 was pleased to order the creation of Param Putu Administrative Circle with camp Headquarter at Loth under Lower Subansiri District. According to the petitioner, pursuant thereto, the respondent authorities through the respondent No. 5 are constructing structures for establishment of Param Putu Administrative Circle at Loth. The grievance of the petitioner is that the place where the structures are being constructed by the respondent authorities for establishment of the Param Putu Administrative Circle, Headquarter at Loth is not within the land which was donated by the petitioners, though it falls within the area ear-marked for establishment of Param Putu Administrative Circle. The petitioners, further contends that Loth falls under the Tajgi Village Reserve Forest area and accordingly, their grievance is that the Headquarter of Param Putu Administrative Circle should not be established at Loth but, Page No.# 6/6 should be established in the land donated by the petitioners. Highlighting the aforesaid grievance of the petitioners, the petitioners states to have submitted a representation dated 14.02.2023 to the Commissioner, District Administration, Government of Arunachal Pradesh, which has not been considered by the Commissioner, District Administration, Government of Upon hearing the learned counsels appearing for the parties, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of at the motion stage itself by directing the Commissioner, District Administration, Government of Arunachal Pradesh to consider and dispose of the representation submitted by the petitioners on 14.02.2023 on its own merit. It is ordered accordingly. The writ petition stands disposed of with above direction. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/6 GAHC040002332023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C) 101/2023 1:Khyoda Heri and 12 Ors. Son of Late Khyoda Tejging , Permanent Resident of Village Tajge, PO Raka, District Lower Subansiri, Arunachal Pradesh. 2: Tanik Bath Son of Late Tanik Eyu Permanent Resident of Village Tajge 3: Khyoda Yarang G.B. Tajge Wife of Shri Khyoda Tallam Permanent Resident of Village Tajge 4: Biki Priya G.B. Tajge Son of Late Biki Oye Permanent Resident of Village Tajge Page No.# 2/6 5: Khyoda Nyibang Son of Late Khyoda Epak Permanent Resident of Village Tajge 6: Tok Tarang Son of Late Tok Tako Permanent Resident of Village Linia 7: Gokia Taging Son of Late Gokia Tudh Permanent Resident of Village Rakha 8: Tayo Kha Ex. GPM Khesang Putu Wife of Shri Tayo Tallam Permanent Resident of Village Khesang Putu 9: Dora Tadak Son of Late Dora Tada Permanent Resident of Village Peet Page No.# 3/6 10: Dora Takia Son of Shri Dora Tedh Permanent Resident of Village Balam 11: Khyoda Yamik Ex. GPM Tajge Wife of Late Khyoda Nibang Permanent Resident of Village Gench 12: Rending Tayo Beki Son of Late Tayo Tugung Permanent Resident of Village Khesang Putu 13: Dora Puri GPM Peet Gram Segment S/o Shri Dora Tadak Permanent Resident of Vill. Peet Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF AP and 4 Ors. Through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Page No.# 4/6 Represented through Commissioner, District Administrative, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 791111 2:The Deputy Commissioner Lower Subansiri District Ziro P.O Hapoli 3:The Executive Engineer PWD Yazali Division P.O Yazali Lower Subansiri District 4:The Divisional Forest Officer Hapoli Forest Division PO Hapoli 5:Harung Tar Permanent Resident of Village Loth Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Tayum Son Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) Page No.# 5/6 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.