- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 March 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- AB 33/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 12-03-2024 Heard Mr. D. Soki, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. Tsering, the learned Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 2/2
This is an application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of Crime Branch P.S. Case No. 02//2023 under Sections 120B/403/406/182 of the Indian Penal Code.
Pursuant to the interim order granted to the petitioner, he had appeared before the Investigating Officer and has cooperated with the police investigation. Today, the police investigating officer had filed a report to that effect stating that the petitioner is going to be shown as a witness in the instant case.
Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner, Shri Riku Chandra Das does not deserve to be detained in custody and his pre-arrest bail application is allowed. The interim bail order granted in favour of the petitioner by this Court is made absolute.
Case diary shall be returned.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002362024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/33/2024 Riku Chandra Das Son of Late Nihar Chandra Das, permanent resident of Rani Pukhuri Village, Po and PS Lanka, Hojai Sub Division, Nagaon District, Assam 782446 VERSUS The State of AP represented by the Spl PP (SIT) Advocate for the Petitioner : Duge Soki Advocate for the Respondent : Spl.PP (SIT) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.