VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Shahkhah Jomoh and 10 Ors v. The State of Ap and 2 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
16 September 2024
Bench
Kalyan Rai Suranaauthor
Case no.
WP(C) 84/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040002522024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/84/2024 Shahkhah Jomoh and 10 Ors Assistant Surveyor Works (ASW) (Officiating), Office of the Chief Engineer, Department of Urban Development and Housing, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791111 2: Kaling Dai Pasighat Division PO and PS Pasighat East Siang District 3: Bamang Amar Koloriang Division PO and PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District 4: Giluk Belo Smart City Govt of Arunachal Pradeh in deputation Papumpare District Page No.# 2/4 5: Nyatum Bagra Aalo Division PO and PS Aalo West Siang District 6: Toko Yami Ziro Division PO and PS Ziro Lower Subansiri District 7: Gebi Perme Chayangtajo Division PO and PS Chayangtajo East Kameng District 8: A K Pual Office of the Chief Engineer Papumparee District 9: Atiang Tagi Department of Urban Development Office of Chief Engineer Itanagar Page No.# 3/4 10: Nanong Nangkar Yingkiong Division PO and PS Yingkiong Upper Siang District 11: Lorapmai Pul Anjaw Division PO and PS Hawai Anjaw District Arunachal Prades VERSUS The State of AP and 2 Ors through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Commissioner Age: 0 Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 791111 3:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : Sunil Mow, T Siga,Jumken Ete,Sonam Tsomo,Chanya Bangsia,Madan Mili,Tali Umbey,Aruna Rai,S D Loda,Reken Ingo Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC UD and Housing,Pritam Taffo

Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 17.09.2024 Both sides are duly represented. Mr. R. Ingo, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have addressed the grievance of the petitioners and accordingly, he has instruction not to press this matter. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed having been not pressed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.