VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Naranath Perme and Anr v. The State of Ap

Allowed
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
11 March 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
AB 34/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 12-03-2024 Heard Mr. T. Chakravorty, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms T. Jini, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Page No.# 2/2 for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.

This is an application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in respect of Nirjuli P.S. Case No. 106/2023 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Pursuant to the interim order granted in favour of the petitioners, they had cooperated with the police investigation. Ms T. Jini, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor also endorsed this fact.

Since both the petitioners have cooperated with the police investigation, they do not deserve to be detained in custody and their pre-arrest bail application is allowed. The interim bail order granted in their favour by this Court is made absolute.

The present bail application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002612024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/34/2024 Naranath Perme and Anr Son of Late Nil Perme, resident of Garakhiya Chuk, Garakhiya Chuksukati NC, PO Borkhamukh, PS Ghilmara, Lakhimpur District, Assam 2: Subash Perme @ Sebash Age: Occupation VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Biplob Borah Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.