- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 3 March 2024
- Bench
- N. Unni Krishnan Nair
- Case no.
- MC(WP(C)) 1/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 04-03-2024 Heard Mr. H. Lampu, the learned counsel for the applicant/ writ petitioner and Ms K. Wangmu, the learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.
This application has been instituted by the applicant/writ petitioner praying for interference with the Order dated 30.08.2022, by which the writ petitioner vide WP(C) No.416(AP)/2015 was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This Court has perused the justification advanced by the learned counsel as laid down in the application and finds that the same is satisfactory and accordingly, the writ petition is restored to be filed subject to the condition that the petitioner's counsel shall argue the connected writ petition for final disposal on 06.03.2024.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040002792024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : MC(WP(C))/1/2024 Khoda Takar Son of Khoda Laji, resident of Reru Village, PO and PS Ziro, Lower Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 3 Ors represented by the Secretary, Department of Home, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Dirctor General of Ploice Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Inspector General of Police Age: 0 Occupation : 4:The Superintendent of Police Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Hage Lampu Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.