- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 5 March 2024
- Bench
- N. Unni Krishnan Nair
- Case no.
- CRP 8/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 06.03.2024 Mr. Limi Bam, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he has the instructions of the petitioners not to press this civil revision petition, at this stage. He, however, prays for liberty to re-file the same. Prayer is accepted. The civil revision petition accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file a fresh petition if so necessitated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/1 GAHC040003072024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/8/2024 Lhakpa Kigar and Anr Son of Late Karma Lera Kigar, permanent resident of Pharge Village, PO and PS Mechuka, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh 2: Sange Khandu Kigar Age: Occupation VERSUS The Additional Deputy Commissioner and Anr Menchuka, Shi Yomi District, Arunachal Pradesh 2:Pema Chonga Kigar Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.