VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

M/S Agam Construction v. The State of Ap and 7 Ors

Rejected
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
3 April 2024
Bench
Kardak Eteauthor
Case no.
IA(C) 43/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040003122024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/43/2024 M/s Agam Construction proprietor Shri Tarem Darang, head office at Mirbuk, PO Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh 791102 represented by Shri Mimar Dirchi, Son of Domi Dirchi, power of attorney holder of M/s Agam Construction, permanent resident of Lipu Village, Likabali, PO Likabali, Lower Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 787110

VERSUS The State of AP and 7 Ors represented by the Secretary, RWD, Govt of AP, Itanagar 2:The Chief Executive Officer Age: 0 Occupation : ARRDA RWD Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 3:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : PMGSY ARRDA RWD Govt of AP Itanagar Page No.# 2/3 4:The Superintendent Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Basar Rural Works Circle Page Leparada District Govt of Arunachal Pradesh 5:The Executive Engnieer cum PIU Age: 0 Occupation : Likabali Division Rural Works Department Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 6:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Tender Evaluation Board (Technical) for NIT dated 03.10.2023 for construction of road from MRLO4-LKB ALG BRO road to Dipa package No. AR2106046 7:M/s I T Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by the proprietor Smti Nonngam Wangsu Wife of Doi Tarak head office at Kangku PO Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 787110 8:M/s Sunwin Energy and Infra Private Limoted Age: 0 Occupation : represented by the Director Shri Praveen Sharma Son of Late Ramavtar Sharma head office at 3rd Floor Balaji Point Opposite Marwari Hospital Athgaon Guwahati Assam 78100 Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Petitioner : Binter Picha Advocate for the Respondent : Gimi Tarak

BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 04-04-2024 Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the applicant/writ petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the interlocutory application being IA(C)No.43(AP)2024. Mr. G. Tarak, learned standing counsel for the Rural Works Department appearing for the respondents is present. Prayer of the learned counsel for the applicant is allowed. Accordingly, the interlocutory application stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.