M/S Haniya Enterprise v. The State of Ap and 5 Ors

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040003362024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WA/9/2024 M/s Haniya Enterprise represented by its proprietor Shri Tarh Kina, permanent resident of Arung Village, PO Mengio, PS Sagalee, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 791119

VERSUS The State of AP and 5 Ors represented by the Secretary, Education, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 791111 2:The Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Education Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 3:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Engineering Wing Department of Education Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 4:The Chairman Age: 0 Occupation : Tender Evaluation Board Engineering Wing Department of Education Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 5:M/s Jumsi Enterprise Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : proprietor Smti Nabam Aka having its registered office at Doye building Vivek Vihar PO Itanagar Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh-791111 6:M/s Durga Store Age: 0 Occupation : Proprietor Shri Taba Laji having its registered office at Near PTC Banderdewa PO and PS Banderdewa Papumpare District Arunachal Pradesh 79112 Advocate for the Petitioner : Parswajyoti Das Nair Advocate for the Respondent : Taba Tagum

:: BEFORE :: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR

O R D E R

14.03.2024.

(N. U.K. Nair, J)

Heard the learned counsel Mr. P.D. Nair appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. T. Tagum, the learned Standing Counsel, Education Department, Government of Arunachal Pradesh.

¶2The present intra-Court appeal is preferred against an order dated

07.02.2024 passed in WP(C) No.48 (AP)/2024 to the extent that the Page No.# 3/3 learned Single Judge while issuing notice in the matter, had not issued an interim direction, as has been prayed for.

¶3On perusal of the order dated 07.02.2024, it is seen that the notice issued therein was made returnable after 4(four) weeks.

¶4More than four weeks have since elapsed in the matter and it is stated at the Bar that the respondents would be preferring affidavit in the writ petition, invariably, without fail, by 20.03.2024.

¶5Mr. Nair, accordingly, submits that the writ petition be requested to be taken for final consideration.

¶6Accordingly, without entering into the issue as raised in the present appeal, the writ appeal is closed with a request to the learned Single Judge to consider the issue for final disposal, if otherwise not inconvenienced, on 26.03.2024.

¶7Parties, accordingly, may appear before the learned Single Judge on 26.03.2024.

¶8Registry is also directed to list the writ petition being WP(C) No.48

(AP)/2024 before the appropriate Single Bench on 26.03.2024.

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant