- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 29 May 2024
- Bench
- N. Unni Krishnan Nair
- Case no.
- AB 56/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 30.05.2024
Heard Mr. S. Mow, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the Page No.# 2/2 Case Diary in connection with Anini P.S. Case No. 03/2024, registered under Section 25(1-A) of Arms Act 1959. He has submitted that the petitioner has duly complied with the Section 41A notice issued to him. On perusal of the materials available on record, it is seen that there is no necessity at this stage for custodial interrogation of the petitioner herein and accordingly, the interim bail as granted to the petitioner vide order dated 19.03.2024 is made absolute in terms thereof.
The conditions as laid out in the order dated 19.03.2024 shall continue to apply in the matter and the petitioner is required to comply with the same.
With the above observation, the present anticipatory bail application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040003492024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/56/2024 Cheena Miso Son of Shri Buke Miso, resident of Hunli, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh 792110 VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Sunil Mow Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.