- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 March 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- IA(Crl) 15/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 12-03-2024 Heard Ms. C. Ering, the learned counsel for the applicant and Ms L. Hage, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
Page No.# 2/2 In BA 09(AP)/2024, on 04.03.2024, this Court allowed the accused, Shri Milli Tedik to go on interim bail. It was further directed that the interim bail order shall continue from 18.03.2024 to
28.03.2024.
Now, by filing the interlocutory application, it has been submitted that the accused has to appear before the examination after travelling a long distance therefore, the bail order should continue from 17.03.2024 to 29.03.2024.
I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for both the sides. The modification is allowed. The aforesaid interim bail order shall continue from 17.03.2024 to 29.03.2024, thereafter, the accused shall surrender before the trial court.
The interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040003562024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/15/2024 Milli Yaram D/o Shri Milli Tada, resident of Raga - II, PO and PS Raga, Kamle District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : C Ering Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.