Tagung Neri v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 27-06-2024 Heard Mr. R. Sonar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. J. Tsering, learned Special Public Prosecutor, SIT and Mr. Manish Kumar Agarwal, complainant in-person.

Page No.# 2/4

¶2This is an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with CB P.S. Case No. 02/2023 under Sections 120(B)/403/406/182 IPC, arising out of FIR dated 22.04.2023.

¶3By an order dated 13.03.2024, the petitioner was protected by an interim order directing that in the event of arrest of the accused applicant being arrested in connection with the above CB P.S. Case No.02/2023, the arresting authority shall release him on execution of bail amount of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority.

¶4It is submitted that the accused applicant, thereafter, has appeared before the I.O. of the case on 14.03.2024 with the copy of the order of this Court passed on 13.03.2024. And on such appearance, the I.O of the case had arrested the accused applicant, Shri Tagung Neri in connection with the above CB P.S Case No. 02/2023, and on the same day, the arrested accused was released on bail on the strength of the interim anticipatory bail granted to him on execution of bail bond of Rs.20,000/- to the satisfaction of the arresting authority.

¶5The learned Special Public Prosecutor, SIT has produced the case diary along with the status report and I have perused the Page No.# 3/4 same. The learned Special Public Prosecutor has also produced before the Court, the intimation of arrest and bail granted to the accused applicant.

¶6The learned Special Public Prosecutor, SIT also submitted that after the arrest and release of the accused, the accused has been cooperating with the I.O. of the case for further investigation of the case and he is appearing before the I.O, as and when called for. Accordingly, the learned Special Public Prosecutor, SIT, submits that he has no objection if the interim bail granted to the applicant is made absolute.

¶7In view of the above and since, the accused applicant has been cooperating with the investigating agency, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the accused applicant on 13.03.2024, is hereby regularised and made absolute on the same terms with a further conditions that the accused applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer.

¶8With the above observation and directions, this bail application stands closed.

Page No.# 4/4

¶9This bail order shall be read along with the bail order dated

13.03.2024.

Return the case diary.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040003642024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/59/2024 Tagung Neri Son of Shri Changrang Neri, resident of Village Huto, PO and PS Doimukh, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP through the Special PP (SIT) Advocate for the Petitioner : Rajesh Sonar Advocate for the Respondent : Spl.PP (SIT) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG