- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 27 June 2024
- Bench
- Budi Habung
- Case no.
- AB 60/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 28-06-2024 Heard Mr. R. L. Thungon, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms T. Jini, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Page No.# 2/3
¶2The petitioner filed this bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, praying for grant of pre-arrest bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Itanagar P.S. Case No.220/2023, under Section 120(B)/420 IPC.
¶3By an Order dated 19.03.2024, while calling for the case diary, the accused applicant was protected by an interim order directing that in the event the accused applicant being arrested in connection with the above Itanagar P.S. Case No.220/2023, the arresting authority shall release him on execution of bail amount of Rs.50,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority.
¶4It is submitted that the accused applicant, thereafter, has appeared before the I.O. of the case on 03.06.2024 and on his appearance, the I.O of the case has examined and recorded his statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C.
¶5The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the case diary and I have perused the same.
¶6As per the record, the accused applicant has appeared before the I.O. of the case and given his statement under Section 161 Cr.P.C. However, there is no record of accused having arrested on his appearance. It appears that the accused is not required to be Page No.# 3/3 arrested in the case.
¶7Since, the accused applicant has already appeared before the I.O of the case and cooperating with the investigation of the case, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has no objection, if the interim bail granted to the applicant is made absolute in terms of the interim anticipatory bail order dated 19.03.2024.
¶8In view of the above, the interim order granted to the accused applicant on 19.03.2024, is hereby regularised and made absolute in same terms and conditions.
¶9This bail order shall be read along with the bail order dated
19.03.2024.
¶10With the above observation, this bail application stands closed.
Return the case diary.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040003952024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/60/2024 Deepak Kumar Jain aged about 43 years, Son of Kamal Jain, resident of village Uparhali Town, Bijay Nagar, P.S Palashbari, District Kamrup (R) Assam VERSUS THE STATE OF AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : D Gogoi Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.