Nabam Tado v. The State of Ap and 4 Ors

O R D E R

28.03.2024.

Heard Mr. K. Apa, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. T.T. Tara, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. Tapin, learned Sr. Govt. Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh for the State respondents. None appears for the respondent No.4. It is stated at the Bar that the matter has become infructuous, in view of the nature of prayer made in this Writ Petition to the effect that the petitioner may be allowed to continue as Executive Engineer in the PWD Yazali, till

31.03.2024 and there is no any live issue to be adjudicated by this Court. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and as agreed to by the parties, this Writ Petition stands closed on having been become infructuous.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040004002024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/130/2024 Nabam Tado S/o Late Nabam Tangam, aged about 54 years, a village Kebi, PO/PS Yazali, District Keyi Panyor, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Principal Secretary (PWD), Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Election Commission of India Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Chief Engineer (Vig. and Trg.) Age: 0 Occupation : 4:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : 5:Takum Nalo (EE) Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE