Makyar Jamoh v. Nonggan Rukbo

ORDER Date : 28-05-2024 Heard Mr. D. Panging, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. Taki, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent.

The present interlocutory application has been preferred praying for Page No.# 2/3 condonation of delay of 134 days instituting the connected CRP/09(AP)/2024.

Mr. Panging, learned counsel has submitted that the delay so occasioning was on a wrong advice as given to the petitioner in the matter. It is further submitted that on being made aware that the civil revision petition in the present matterwould lie, the petitioner had expeditiously got the matter processed and the connected civil revision petition was so filed. However, in the process a delay of 134 days had occasioned in the matter.

Mr. Taki, learned counsel for the sole respondent has vehemently opposed the prayer so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner for condonation of delay and has submitted that the explanation has not been so done for each day of delay occasioning in the matter.

This Court has perused the cause as shown in the application preferred by the petitioner for condonation of delay and on perusal of the same, this Court is of the view that the delay as occasioning in the matter has been duly explained, and as such the same is required to be condoned.

Accordingly, the interlocutory application is allowed by condoning Page No.# 3/3 the delay of 134 days in filing the connected civil revision petition.

With the above directions,the interlocutory application stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040004292024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/52/2024 Makyar Jamoh Son of Late Oyem Jamoh, resident of Tigra Mirbuk Village, Pasighat, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Nonggan Rukbo Son of Late Akek Rukbo, resident of Mirku Village, Pasighat, PO and PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Dicky Panging Advocate for the Respondent : Tabit Tapak BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR