Kamen Ringu v. Kahfa Bengia and 22 Ors

ORDER Date : 04-04-2024 Heard Mr. Muk Pertin, learned Senior counsel assisted by Ms. T. Y. Bhutia, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P. Taffo, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 1 and 2. By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant submits that steps for service of notice upon respondent nos. 3 to 23 could not be taken due to lack of postal stamp in the Post Office; hence, prays for allowing the applicant to take steps for service of notice upon the said respondents by a dasti service in addition to the steps for service of notice though a registered post with AD, as directed by this Court on 27.03.2024. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner shall take steps upon the respondent nos. 3 to 23 by way of dasti service, in addition to the steps for service of notice through a registered post with AD, as directed by this Court on 27.03.2024 within 2 (two) days. With the above, this IA stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040004592024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/54/2024 Kamen Ringu Son of Shri Ringu Tada, a resident of K Ringu Complex, G Extension, Naharlagun, PO and PS Naharlagun, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Kahfa Bengia and 22 Ors Son of Late Tajak Bengia, PPA Office, Mowb-II near AG Office, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh 2:Kaling Jerang 3:Lukyi Boje 4:Bai Gadi 5:Pani Topo 6:Biri Joy Page No.# 2/4 7:Rigam Santhana 8:Techi Kama 9:Shotike Hopak 10:Ha Tagong 11:Takam Taluk 12:Dorjee Khandu 13:Biri Hanu 14:Bamang Taram 15:Apali Gyadi 16:Tarh Atung Page No.# 3/4 17:Tai Tadap 18:Niktar Tamo 19:Nangram Tajuk 20:Engam Lado 21:Ijum Tally 22:Bamik Karcho 23:Biter Tally Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Tshering Yangzom Bhutia Advocate for the Respondent : Pritam Taffo Page No.# 4/4 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG