- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 7 April 2024
- Bench
- Budi Habung
- Case no.
- IA(Crl) 23/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 08-04-2024 Heard Mr. T. Pahi, the learned counsel for the applicant and Ms T. Jini, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh.
By filing this interlocutory application, the applicant has prayed Page No.# 2/2 for impleadment of complainant, Shri Phanidhar Kalita, as respondent No.2 in Crl.Petn. No.217(AP)/2023 as he is a necessary party for proper disposal of the case.
Ms T. Jini, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has no objection to the said impleadment.
In view of the above, prayer for impleadment of complainant, Shri Phanidhar Kalita, as respondent No.2 in Crl.Petn. No.217(AP)/2023, is allowed.
Accordingly, the petitioner shall file amended cause title in Crl.Petn. No.217(AP)/2023. Thereafter, the Registry shall do the needful for amendment of the cause title.
Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040004642024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/23/2024 Nayan Jyoti Barman Son of Jogen Barman, a permanent resident of Ghograpar village, P/O and P/S Ghograpar, District Nalbari, Assam VERSUS The State of AP and Anr represented by the PP of AP, Gauhati High Court Itanagar Permanent Bench, Yupia 2:Phanidhar Kalita Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Tem Pahi Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.