- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 May 2023
- Bench
- S.K.Medhi
- Case no.
- IA(C) 71/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 16.05.2023
Heard Shri N Khera, learned counsel for the applicant, who, by means of this interlocutory application, has prayed for modification/vacation/alteration of the interim order dated 07.02.2023 passed in WP(C)/58(AP)/2023. It is submitted that this Court, while issuing notice vide the order dated
07.02.2023, had passed an interim order. However, a bare perusal of the aforesaid order dated 07.02.2023 would reflect that no restraint was imposed upon the applicant which is a respondent in the writ petition. For ready reference, the operative part of the aforesaid order dated 07.02.2023 is extracted hereinbelow:
"Finalization of the NIe-T dated 30.01.2023, issued by the Chief Executive Officer, Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation LRFP vide File No. PSCDCL/EOI/2022-23/01 and work awarded pursuant thereto shall be subject to further order(s) that may be passed in this writ petition."
Also heard Shri T Gyatso, learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner, who, however, submits that his senior Shri A Tatak, learned counsel is unwell. The learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner, however, fairly submits that there is no restraint as such and accordingly, the interlocutory Page No.# 4/4 application is not even maintainable. On a reading of the aforesaid order dated 07.02.2023, this Court is also of the opinion that no restraint has been imposed on the applicant/respondent. Under these circumstances, Shri Khera, learned counsel for the opposite party/writ petitioner wishes to withdraw this interlocutory application. The interlocutory application is, accordingly closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040005452023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C) 71/2023 1:M/s Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang, Arunachal Pradesh, having its registered Office at JAYPEE Complex, Agam Colony, Mirku Dapi Tinali, High Region, Pasighat 791102, East Siang, Arunachal Pradesh, Represented by its Town Planner, Shri Tani Taloh, S/o Taye Taloh, R/o PSCDCL Office, Jaypee Smart City Campus, Agam Colony, Pasighat 791102, East Siang, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS 1:M/s Oishy Enterprise and 2 Ors Represented by its Proprietor Shri Angkin Lego, S/o Shri Nganpin Lego, R/o Village Yapgo, Pasighat, PO/PS Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:THE STATE OF AP Represented by the Secretary Town Planning and Urban Local Bodies Civil Secretariat Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chairperson Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : N Khera Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) Page No.# 2/4 Linked Case : WP(C) 58/2023 1:M/s Oishy Enterprise Represented by its Proprietor Shri Angkin Lego S/o Shri Ngangin Lego R/o Village Yagpo Pasighat PO/PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. Cont. No 919436807127 VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF AP and 2 Ors. Represented by the Secretary Town Planning and Urban Local Bodies Civil Secretariat Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Deputy Commissioner cum Chairperson Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Chief Executive Officer Pasighat Smart City Development Corporation District East Siang Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : Adam Tatak Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.K.MEDHI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.