VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Achung Natung v. Rani Gyadi

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
9 May 2024
Bench
Susmita Phukan Khaund, Kardak Ete
Case no.
IA(C) 76/2024

Judgment

ORDER Date : 10.05.2024 (S.P. Khaund, J)

Heard Mr. D. Laji, learned counsel for the applicant/appellant. Also heard Mr. T. Garam, learned counsel for the respondent.

¶2The applicant has filed this application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC for short). The connected RFA No. Page No.# 2/3 1(AP)/2021 was filed by the appellant/applicant seeking a decree of divorce. The respondent/say-Y filed the Divorce Case No. 03/2019 for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, before the District Judge, West Kamreng district, Bomdila, Arunachal Pradesh. The learned District Judge was pleased to dissolve the marriage by a decree of divorce, with a direction to the applicant/appellant to pay an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lacs) as permanent alimony to the respondent wife vide judgment and order dated

27.07.2020 and decree dated 31.07.2020 (Annexure-VIII and IX).

¶3On being aggrieved by the judgment and order, the applicant/appellant has preferred an appeal before this Court, registered as RFA No. 01(AP)/2021. At present both the parties have reached a consensus and they have amicably settled the dispute between themselves outside the Court. The terms and conditions of the settlement has been set out in their Matrimonial Settlement Agreement dated 09.09.2023 and the parties have complied with the terms and conditions.

¶4The applicant/appellant and the respondent have jointly agreed to the decree in terms of the aforementioned Matrimonial Settlement Agreement dated

09.09.2023. The terms and conditions which has been appended as Annexure-1 of this interlocutory application, is marked as 'X'.

¶5We have considered the submissions at the bar with circumspection.

¶6As both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, both the parties are directed to abide by the terms and conditions of the Annexure-1 marked as 'X'. The agreement 'X' will also form a part of the decree dated 31.07.2020 in connection with Divorce Case No. 03/2019.

¶7In terms of the above observations, this interlocutory application stands Page No.# 3/3 disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040006052024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/76/2024 Achung Natung Son of Shri Dugu Natung, resident of Pipokoro, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Rani Gyadi D/o Pacha Gyadi, resident of Nerewa, PO and PS Seppa, East Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Duyu Laji Advocate for the Respondent : BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.