Pinak Pani Roy v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 12-08-2024 Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. It is submitted by Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioner that the Charge-sheet has not been laid against the petitioner rather he has been made as a witness. Since, the present petition has been filed initially under the impression that the Charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner, the Page No.# 2/2 present petition may be closed. Having considered the submission that the petitioner has not been Charge-sheeted rather has been made as a witness and the petition having been filed under misconception of the case, the present criminal petition is dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040006422024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./67/2024 Pinak Pani Roy Son of Late Panna Kanti Roy, resident of House No. 40, Basistha Nagar Road, Natun Bazaar, PS Basistha, Guwahati, Kamrup (M) Assam 781029 VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Binter Picha Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE