The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, v. The Secretary,

ORDER Date : 27.05.2024 (N.U.K. Nair, J)

Heard Ms. N. Anju, learned counsel for the applicant/ appellant. Also heard Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Govt. advocate for the opposite parties no. 1 and 2, Mr. S.K. Deuri, learned counsel for the opposite party no.3. None appears on call for the opposite party no.4.

¶2The present application has been filed by the applicant seeking impleadment of Shri Bharat Rai and Shri Gopal Tok as a respondents no. 5 and 6 in the present proceedings on the ground that their names were not arrayed as respondents in the writ appeal inadvertently. However, the said persons were party respondents in the connected writ petition.

¶3We have perused the contentions raised in the application and on finding that the persons sought to be impleaded were already made party respondents in the writ proceedings, we accordingly allow the applicant/ appellant to implead the said persons as respondents no. 5 and 6 in the connected writ appeal.

¶4Accordingly, the present interlocutory application stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3 JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040006662024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/89/2024 The Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission, represented by the Secretary, Itanagar , Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The Secretary, Home, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Director General of Police Age: 0 Occupation : 3:Wangrum Hosai Age: 0 Occupation : 4:Deveso Chaitom Age: 0 Occupation : 5:Bharat Rai Age: 0 Occupation : 6:Gopal Tok Age: 0 Page No.# 2/3 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Nani Anju Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR