- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 2 April 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C) 19/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 03.04.2024
None appears for the petitioner on call. Mr. T. Tagum, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor no. 1 and Ms. N. Anju, learned counsel for the contemnor no. 2, jointly submits that the order of this Court dated 22.07.2022, passed in WP(C)291/(AP)2019 and order dated
05.12.2023, passed in Review Petition no. 13/(AP)2022, have been duly complied with by the alleged contemnor. Perused the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the alleged contemnors. Vide the order dated 18.12.2023, the alleged contemnor no. 1 has passed a speaking order in compliance of the order of this Court dated 05.12.2023, passed in Review Petition no. 13/(AP)2022. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040006942023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/19/2023 Abdul Latif S/o Late Abdul Kaddus, R/o Village Bhowkamari, PO Kayakuchi, District Barpeta, Assam. VERSUS Amzad Tak and Anr. The Commissioner and Secretary to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Higher Education Department, Office of Directorate of Higher and Technical Education Department, Department of Education, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar, PIN 791111 2:D. Varma Age: 0 Occupation : Secretary Arunachal Pradesh Service Commission (APPSC) Vidhan Vihar Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh PIN 79111 Advocate for the Petitioner : D F A Ahmed Advocate for the Respondent : Tagum Jamoh Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.