Bamang Rukpu v. The State of Ap

ORDER Date : 31.05.2024

Heard Mr. T. Topu, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor of the State respondent.

Mr. Topu, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently the victim has not been impleaded in the present Page No.# 2/2 proceedings as a party respondent. Accordingly, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present application with liberty to re-file the same after rectifying the error in filing the present proceedings.

Prayer is accepted.

The present application stands dismissed on withdrawal. However, with liberty to re-file the same.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040007052024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/93/2024 Bamang Rukpu Son of Shri Bamang Taro, residence of Ganga Village, PO and PS Itanagar, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP through the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Taba Topu Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR