- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 15 July 2024
- Bench
- Budi Habung
- Case no.
- AB 95/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 16.07.2024
Heard Ms. A. Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
This is an application under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, 1973, praying for grant Page No.# 2/3 of privilege of pre-arrest bail in connection with Doimukh P.S. Case No. 43/2024, under Sections 341/325/354 of IPC, 1860.
By an order dated 06.06.2024, the accused/applicant was granted an interim anticipatory bail with a direction to release the accused/applicant in the event of his arrest in connection with Doimukh P.S. Case No. 43/2024 on execution of bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen thousand) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority with certain conditions
The learned Additional Public prosecutor fairly submitted that after obtaining the interim anticipatory bail the accused /applicant has appeared before the I.O of the case more than one occasion and he is co-operating with the investigating agency for further investigation of the case. Under such circumstances, the custodial detention/interrogation of the accused/applicant is not required.
In view of above, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the accused/applicant on 06.06.2024 is hereby regularized and made absolute with same terms and conditions. This bail application shall be read along with the bail order dated 06.06.2024.
With the above observation, this anticipatory bail applicant stands disposed of. Page No.# 3/3
Case Diary be returned back. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040007232024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/95/2024 Lokam Tani (Anthony) Son of Lokam Tagung, permanent resident of Damin Village, PO and PS Damin, Kurung Kumey District, Arunachal Pradesh adn presently residing at Nirjuli, PO and PS Nirjuli, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Reken Ingo Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.