- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 16 September 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- CRP 21/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 17.09.2024
Mr. V. Jamoh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has an instruction to withdraw the present petition. Therefore, he prays that he may be allow to withdraw the same.
Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent is present.
The prayer of the petitioner is accepted and allowed.
Accordingly, the present civil revision petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040007402024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/21/2024 Smti Dongam Jini Wife of Late Rayom Jini, permanent resident of Old Market, Aalo, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Yomto Jini and Anr Son of Late Rayom Jini, resident of Sipu colony, PO and PS Aalo, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh 2:Smti Ige Lollen Jini Age: 0 Occupation : Wife of Shri Yomto Jini resident of Sipu colony PO and PS Aalo West Siang District Arunachal Prades Advocate for the Petitioner : Vijay Jamoh, S Tsering,Bakar Dulom,B Padung Advocate for the Respondent : Duge Soki, Token Ete,Topi Jini Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.