Sangha Tagik v. The State of Ap and 9 Ors

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040007962024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/247/2024 Sangha Tagik proprietor of M/s Atu Apa Developers, resident of Hasi Namlo, Chimpu, Papumpare District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The State of AP and 9 Ors represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar 2:The Principal Secretary (PWD) Age: 0 Occupation : Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 3:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Central Zone-A PWD Itanagar 4:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Yachuli Civil Circle PWD Arunachal Pradesh 5:The Executive Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Sangram Division PWD Page No.# 2/3 Sangram Arunachal Pradesh 6:The Tender Evolution Board cum Tender Evaluation Authority Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its Chairman Sangram Division PWD Arunachal Pradesh 7:The Additional Deputy Commissioner cum District Election Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Pradesh. 8:M/s Nikja Brothers Enterprise Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Smti Nikja Yana address Lower Village Niya Colony PO and PS Chimpu Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh 9:M/s Mero Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Pani Tanung Address Pani village PO and PS Koloriang Kurung Kuemy District Arunachal Pradesh 10:M/s Pacho Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Bamang Pacho Address Langbia Village PO Parsi Parlo PS Koloriang Kurung Kumey District Arunachal Prades Advocate for the Petitioner : Teto Taba, Nimcha Hondique,Anong kabak,Mardo Game,Vijay Duku Page No.# 3/3 Raji,C Ering,Begi Taba Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),

-BEFORE-HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG

22.10.2024 Heard Mr. T. Taba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Y. Riram, learned Govt. Advocate for State respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition since the petitioner in this writ petition are no longer interested to pursue the matter. In view of the above and as prayed for, the WP (C) 247 (AP) 2024 stands closed on withdrawal by the learned counsel for the petitioner and accordingly, stands disposed of.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant