VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2023 › High Court of Gauhati

Kenben Tachang v. Techi Nippu Tara and 4 Ors

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
27 June 2023
Bench
Arun Dev Choudhuryauthor
Case no.
IA(C) 114/2023

Judgment

ORDER Date : 27.06.2023

¶1Heard Mr. TT Tara, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶2The present application is filed for impleadement of the applicant as party respondent No. 5 in writ petition being WP(C) 227(AP)/2023.

¶3The WP (C) 227(AP)/2023 was preferred by the writ petitioner Techi Nippu Tara assailing the order of appointment of respondent No. 4 therein i.e. Miss Hira Jaishi to a post of MTS under compassionate ground.

¶4The present applicant, namely, Kenben Techang was also recommended by the same committee by minute dated 28.09.2022, however the present applicant Kenben Techang was recommended for appointment on compassionate ground as Draftsman Grade-III based on his technical qualification.

¶5On the other hand, Miss Hira Jaishi, whose appointment has been challenged in the connected writ petition was recommended for appointment on compassionate ground as MTS. This court passed an Page No.# 4/5 order in the writ petition dated 16.05.2023 whereby it was provided that any appointment (s) made pursuant to the impugned minute shall be subject to outcome of the writ petition.

¶6According to Mr. Tara, learned counsel though there is no clash of interest between the writ petitioner and the present applicant and though the writ petitioner has not challenged appointment of the present applicant, however the authorities are not issuing the appointment order even though due recommendation was made in favour of the present applicant. The authorities are wrongly interpreting the order dated 16.05.2023 treating that all the compassionate appointment recommended in the minute of meeting dated 28.09.2022 has been made subject to outcome of the writ petition.

¶7The learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that they have no grievance against the appointment of the present applicant and therefore said appointment is not challenged.

¶8This court is of the considered opinion that the present applicant is not a necessary party for determination of the connected writ petition inasmuch as neither his appointment has been challenged nor the petitioner is having any claim over the post of Draftsman Grade-III.

¶9This court is also of the view that this court under its order dated

16.05.2023 has not debarred the authority from going ahead with issuing any appointment order subsequent to the recommendation of the petitioner against the post of Draftsman Grade-III as discussed hereinabove inasmuch as such appointment is not even under challenge in the connected writ petition. Page No.# 5/5

¶10In that view of the matter, this court is of the considered opinion that as the order dated 16.05.2023 is clarified, the present applicant is not necessary to be impleaded as party respondent to contest the present writ petition.

¶11In the aforesaid term, the present IA stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page No.# 1/5 GAHC040008472023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C) 114/2023 1:Kenben Tachang S/o Lt. Takar Tachang, Residing at P Sector Nirjuli, near Central Poultry Farm, Nirjuly I (b), Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS 1:Techi Nippu Tara and 4 Ors. S/o Lt. Techi Dodum, Village Deb, PO/PS Sagalee, District Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:THE STATE OF AP Represented by the Secretary UD and Housing Department Itanagar. 3:the Chief Engineer Department of UD and Housing Itanagar Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Papum Pare District 4:the Deputy Director UD and Housing Itanagar Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. 5:Hira Jaishi D/o Lt. Lakshman Jaishi Page No.# 2/5 Resident of Jarku Village PO/PS Pasighat East Siang District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara Advocate for the Respondent : Pritam Taffo Linked Case : WP(C) 227/2023 1:Techi Nippu Tara Son of Late Techi Dodum of Village Deb PO/PS Sagalee District Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS 1:THE STATE OF AP and 3 Ors. Represented by the Secretary UD and Housing Department Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Department of UD and Housing Itanagar Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Papum Pare District 3:The Deputy Director UD and Housing Itanagar Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. 4:Hira Jaishi D/o Lt. Lakshman Jaishi Resident of Jarku Village Page No.# 3/5 PO/PS Pasighat East Siang District Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP) BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.