- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 24 July 2024
- Bench
- Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- AB 102/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 25.07.2024
Heard Mr. N. Ray, learned counsel for the applicant along with Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
Page No.# 2/2 It is seen that the application for pre-arrest bail filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C is for an offence alleged to be committed by the applicant under Section 354A of IPC, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has brought to the notice of the Court that Section 354A of IPC is a bailable offence.
In view of above, this Court finding that the offence under Sections 354A of IPC is a bailable offence, dismisses the instant pre-arrest bail application.
With the above observation, the Bail Application No. 102(AP)/2024 stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008522024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : AB/102/2024 Sanjit Kar aged about 51 years, S/o Shyama Pada Kar, Permanent resident of Kedargouri Apartment A2-104, Garage Chhak, Lewis Road, VTC, Lingaraj, Old Town, Khurda, Odidha, present address, Hotel Kinnara, Namsai, District Namsai, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS THE STATE OF AP represented through Public Prosecutor Advocate for the Petitioner : Sajan Difusa Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.