VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Gauhati High Court 2024 › High Court of Gauhati

Montu Saikia and Anr v. The State of Ap

Disposed Of
Court
High Court of Gauhati
Decided
12 September 2024
Bench
Parthivjyoti Saikiaauthor
Case no.
BA 76/2024

Judgment

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040008702024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : BA/74/2024 Mon Mohan Kalita and Anr Son of Tarun Kalita, Dekachubri village, PO Dekargaon, PS Tezpur, Sonitpur District, 2: Smti Tinamoni Devi Age: Daughter of Babul Nath and wife of Mon Mohan Kalita Haleswar Village PO Haleswar Assa represented by the PP of AP 2:Sonam Daughter of Shri Sumba Advocate for the Petitioner : Tabit Tapak, Aso Dalbong,Y Pangu Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Linked Case : BA/76/2024 Montu Saikia and Anr Age: 32 Address:Son of Mulbuk Saikia and Husband of Pratima Saikia Dekachubri Village PO Dekargaon 2: Smti Pratima Saikia Age: 32 Address:Wife of Shri Montu Saikia Dekachubri Village PO Dekargaon Address:represented by the PP of AP 2:Miss Sonam Age: 22 Address:Daughter of Shri Sumba Arunachal Pradesh. ------------ Advocate for : Tabit Tapak Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for The State of AP: Advocate , appearing for 2, Page No.# 3/4 respectively. Linked Case : BA/75/2024 Debajit Kalita and Anr Age: 31 Address:Son of Tarun Kalita Dekachubri Village PO Dekargaon 2: Smti Hemlata Kolita Age: 53 Address:Wife of Tarun Kolita and Mother of Debajit Kalita Dekachubri Village PO Dekargaon Address:represented by the PP of AP 2:Sonam Address:Daughter of Shri Sumba Arunachal Pradesh. ------------ Advocate for : Tabit Tapak Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for The State of AP: Advocate , appearing for 2, respectively. Page No.# 4/4

BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 13-09-2024 Heard Mr. A. Dalbong, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Arunachal Pradesh. Mr. Dalbong, learned counsel submits that the applicants have moved the Trial Court for seeking bail and therefore, he wants to withdraw these bail applications. After hearing both sides, the prayer of the applicants is allowed. The bail applications are disposed of on withdrawal. Accordingly, all the consequential orders passed earlier are recalled. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.