- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 2 September 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia, Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C) 20/2024
Judgment
ORDER
03.09.2024 (Kardak Ete, J.)
Heard Mr. K. Apa, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Tapin, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1. The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the orders dated
29.01.2024 and 29.04.2024 passed in Writ Appeal No. 06/2024 have duly been complied with. Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040008972024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/20/2024 Ramu Welly Son of Shri Nobo Welly, Village Seijosa, PO and PS Seijosa, Pakke Kessang District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Vivek Pandey and 2 Ors Commissioner (Urban Affairs) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 2:Rokpo Tamin Age: 0 Occupation : 3:Himmar Ete Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara Advocate for the Respondent : Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.