- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 24 July 2024
- Bench
- Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- Crl.Petn. 106/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 25.07.2024
Heard Mr. S. Dahiya, learned counsel for the petitioner along with Ms. L. Hage, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
Page No.# 2/2 It is seen that the instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C seeking quashing of the FIR bearing No. 74/2024, dated 15.07.2024.
In view of above, this Court finds that it will be more appropriate if the instant petition is filed under the appropriate sections of the new criminal laws, since the FIR was filed after 1st July' 2024.
Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed to withdraw the instant petition and make the necessary changes and file a fresh as per the law in force.
With the above observation, the Crl.Petn. No. 106/2024 stands dismissed as above.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040009172024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./106/2024 Salil Pandeya proprietor of Yuvraj Steel Technology SCO Bearing 31, Situated in Club Road, TDI City, Kundli, Sonipat, Haryana 131029 VERSUS The State of AP and Anr through the PP of AP 2:Krish Agarwala Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Sandeep Dahiya Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.