Matheim Linggi and 7 Ors v. The Land Acquisition Collector/ Deputy Commissioner and 3 Ors

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC040009252024

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/111/2024 Matheim Linggi and 7 Ors Son of Shri Ginko Linggi, Resident of Village Mayu-II, PO and PS Roing, District Lower Dibang Valley, Arunachal Pradesh, 792110 2: Runa Elapra Age: Son of Shri Khipa Elapra Resident of Aliney PO and PS Anini District Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh 792101 3: Noti Lingi Age: Son of Shri Dato Lingi resident of Village Chimiri Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh 792110 4: Emoko Pulu Age: Son of Shri Naso Pulu Resident of Village Chidu District Lower Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh 792110 5: Ritige Mihu Age: Page No.# 2/4 Son of Late Athro Mihu Resident of Village Roing District Lower Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh 792110 6: Smti Kamuri Elepra Age: Wife of Jemeta Elapra Resident of Village Iduli District Lower Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh 792110 7: Muba Elapra Age: Son of Jemeta Elapra Resident of Iduli District Lower Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh 792110 8: Jai Elapra Age: Son of Jemeta Elapra Resident of Iduli village District Lower Dibang Valley Arunachal Pradesh 79211 VERSUS The Land Acquisition Collector/ Deputy Commissioner and 3 Ors Roing, PO and PS Roing, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh 792110 2:The Secretary Age: 0 Land Management Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar Page No.# 3/4 3:The Chief Managing Director Age: 0 National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Limited Govt of India Enterprise NHPC Office Complex Sector 33 Faridabad 4:The Executie Direcotr Age: 0 NHPC Roing Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh 79211 Advocate for the Petitioner : Chanya Bangsia, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Land Management),Dugmar Kamduk

– B E F O R E – HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

11.09.2024 (Vijay Bishnoi, CJ)

The matter comes upon for consideration of the application filed on behalf of the applicant/ appellant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 filed on behalf of the appellant who have filed Writ Appeal being W.A. No.20/2024 to condone the delay of 96 days in filing the above referred Appeal.

The notices of the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has already been served upon all the respondents. However, the counsel for the respondents has no objection, if the delay is condoned. In such circumstances, Page No.# 4/4 the I.A. is closed.

The delay of 96 days in filing the Writ Appeal being W.A. No. 20/2024 is condoned.

The interlocutory Application is disposed of.

JUDGE CHIEF

JUSTICE

Comparing Assistant