- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 11 March 2024
- Bench
- Parthivjyoti Saikia
- Case no.
- CRP 37/2023
Judgment
ORDER
12.03.2024
Heard Mr. T. Sunil, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. M. Kato, learned counsel for the respondent. The petitioner was the respondent before the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum. He did not appear before the Tribunal and, therefore, Tribunal Page No.# 2/2 passed ex parte order against him and directed him to pay an amount of Rs.6,40,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum within one month from the date of the order. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an appeal before the State Commission, which is still pending. In the meantime, the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum started execution proceeding. The petitioner has filed objection before the Forum but the same was rejected. Now, the petitioner submits that the State Commission is not working now because of non-availability of Presiding Officer. Therefore, the present application under Section 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the order dated 30.06.2023 passed by the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Papumpare, Capital Complex at Yupia, Arunachal Pradesh. I have considered the submission made by the learned counsel for both the sides. There is no dispute that the appeal is still pending before the State Commission. Therefore, the proper Forum will be the State Commission who can pass necessary order in this matter. On the face of the record, there is nothing wrong in the impugned order warranting exercise of power under section 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the petitioner is advised to move the State Commission where his appeal is presently pending for disposal. With the above direction, the civil revision petition is disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040009512023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/37/2023 M/s I T A Ford A Unit of Apang Rate Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. having its office at Lekhi, PO/PS Nirjuli, District Papumpare. Represented by Sri Khoda Raja, Managing Director, ITA Ford. 8837479691 VERSUS Mogom Ete Son of Hormo Ete, Resident of Model Village, PO/PS Naharlagun, District Papumpare, PIN 791111, Arunachal Pradesh. Advocate for the Petitioner : T Sunil Advocate for the Respondent : Marto Kato BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.