- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 26 September 2024
- Bench
- Kardak Ete
- Case no.
- CRP 29/2024
Judgment
ORDER Date : 27.09.2024 Mr. M. Lego, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, he prays for closure of the matter.
Prayer is allowed.
Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040009662024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/29/2024 Hapu Dikzer Yudik Son of Taa Yudik, resident of Dompurijo, PO and PS Dompurijo, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS Smti Yami Hali (ZPM 16th Giteripa) of 26th Dumporijo ST Constituency, permanent resident of Village New Hali Po and PS Domporijo, Giteripa Circle, Upper Subansiri District, Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka, Nannu Yubi,M Lego,Tame Rimi,Bomyom Ori,Chorpok Modi Advocate for the Respondent : Dicky Panging, Rosy c Lowangcha,Tokge Darin,Kirmar Ado,Doge Lona,Marge D,Daina Tamuk Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.