Taro Nilo v. Tanam Nacho

ORDER Date : 27.09.2024 Mr. M. Lego, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Therefore, he prays for closure of the matter.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands closed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040009662024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : CRP/30/2024 Taro Nilo Age: 49 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tasa Nilo resident of Nilo PO Limeking PS Nacho Upper Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Tanam Nacho Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Tako Nacho permanent resident of Village Jibaying PO and PS Nacho ZPM 2nd Nacho Zilla Parishad 22 Nacho Constituency Upper Subansiri District Arunachal Pradesh ------------ Advocate for the Petitioner : Uttam Deka, Nannu Yubi,M Lego,Tame Rimi,Bomyom Ori,Chorpok Modi Advocate for the Respondent : Dicky Panging, Rosy c Lowangcha,Tokge Darin,Kirmar Ado,Doge Lona,Marge D,Daina Tamuk Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE