- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 28 April 2024
- Bench
- Kaushik Goswami
- Case no.
- Crl.Petn. 141/2023
Judgment
ORDER
29.04.2024
Heard Mr. G. Kato, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. T. Ete, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State respondent.
¶2This is a joint application filed under Section 482 CrPC for compounding the non-compoundable offences between the petitioner No. 1, and petitioner Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 and for quashing of the FIR, which has been registered as Itanagar Women Police Station Case No. 01/2023 in terms of the compromise settlement arrived at amongst the petitioners.
¶3Mr. G. Kato, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the complainant who is the wife of the petitioner No. 1 has entered into a settlement with the petitioner Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 5 and has amicably settled the differences between the parties.
¶4I have heard the submissions made at the bar and I have perused the materials available on record.
¶5It appears from the Settlement Deed enclosed at annexure-3 to the Joint application filed by the complainant/accused that a compromise has been amicably entered between the complainant and the accused whereafter the differences between the parties have been mutually settled.
¶6In view of the aforesaid settlement entered between the parties, for the ends of justice, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR dated 02.01.2023 in Itanagar Women Police Station Case No. 01/2023 under Sections 451/326/427/342/506/34 of Indian Penal Code. Page No.# 3/3 Ordered accordingly. Disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040010492023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : Crl.Petn./141/2023 Taksing Yari and 4 Ors. D/o Shri Taksing Sala, Resident of Mowb I, Rayo Colony, PO/PS Itanagar, Papum Pare, Arunachal Pradesh. Mobile No. 91827588352 2: Tarh Sumpa Kipa Age: Occupation : 3: Tarh Yaka Age: Occupation : 4: Tarh Sumpi Age: Occupation : 5: Roni Ramching Age: Occupation VERSUS THE STATE OF AP Represented through the Learned Public Prosecutor. Advocate for the Petitioner : G Kato Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.