- Court
- High Court of Gauhati
- Decided
- 21 July 2024
- Bench
- Marli Vankung
- Case no.
- WP(C) 364/2023
Judgment
ORDER Date : 22.07.2024
Heard Mr. M. Boje, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the instant case may be allowed to be withdrawn with a permission to file a fresh, since the purpose for filing of the instant writ petition has become defeated during the pendency of the instant writ petition. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawn with a permission to file fresh, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040010662023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/364/2023 Tsering Dorjee Namsa SMO(SG) DFWO/DRCHO. O/o, District Medical Officer, West Kameng District Bomdila, P.O and P.S Bomdila, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Others represented by Commissioner/Secretary Vigilance, Govt. of A.P. Itanagar.2:The Deputy Commissioner cum District Vigilance Officer Age: 0 Occupation : 3:The Commissioner/Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : 4:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : 5:The District Medical Officer Age: 0 Occupation : 6:The Secretary/Director Land Management Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/2 7:The District Land Record and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : Minki Boje Advocate for the Respondent : Taba Tagum BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG
Source: High Court of Gauhati, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.